Larson v Miller - Mahler Realty CV- 07-5005171 (Partition Action - Forfeiture of $150,000.00 deposit by successful bidder at public auction)

Hugman Company Inc. v Robert Errato - LLI - CV-08-5004567 S (Judgment in favor of contractor against homeowner for balance due on contract; Major remodel/teardown determined to be with Home Improvement Act, homeowner found to have acted in bad faith)

Dibble Edge Partners, LLC v Town of Wallingford CV-06-4006084 s (Inverse Condemnation action brought against Town and private land owner alleging a civil conspiracy in violation of 42 U.S.C 1983; Conspiracy claims against private party dismissed)

Lakewood Road Associates v Aydar - CV-05-0001869 s (Action by landlord to recover balances due under commercial lease; Judgment entered in favor of tenant based on constructive eviction)

Intercity Development v Andrade - ANN-CV-02-0079156 (Judgment of foreclosure of mechanic lien in favor of building contractor against homeowner; Homeowner ejected contractor midway through project.)

Intercity Development, LLC v Andrade 286 Conn 177 (2008) (Supreme Court reversal Appellate Court ruling invalidating judgment under Mechanic Lien; remand to Superior Court to reinstate judgment; recovery of postjudgment interest and attorneys fees incurred in connection with appeals)

Bella Vista Condominium Association, Inc. v. Dennis Byars, 102 Conn. App. 245 (2007) ( Judgment in favor of condominium in connection with foreclosure action; Judgment affirmed on appeal ; corporate existence & governance issues raised by way of defense)

Ghent v. Planning Com. of Waterbury, 219 Conn. 511 (Conn. 1991) The supreme court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Court affirmed that judgment that subdivision regulations were too vague and lacked adequate standard for determining when dead-end streets should be permitted

Gallogly v. Kurrus, 97 Conn. App. 662 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006) Appellate Court reversal of trial court judgment of possession. On appeal, the appellate court found that the trial court the parties never agreed on the type and amount of insurance coverage the tenant had to provide and since there was not a "meeting of the minds," no enforceable contract existed. The trial court's judgment was reversed and the case was remanded with direction to the trial court to enter judgment for the tenant.

Gasparri v. Department of Transp., 37 Conn. App. 126 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995) Appellate Court affirmed trial court judgment increasing condemnation award in eminent domain proceeding.